MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 07:18
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 920
83% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
PNY(196E 13E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 117
Parallax 156
136% 147 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
114% 144 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2201 3075 3067 721 243 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 3,935
Write 3,536
Mixed 2,626
SusWrite 1599
654% 2,924 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 78.1
282% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1165
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 1,010
757% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 387%
Great: 507%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 185 178 182 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 354
Write 312
Mixed 301
SusWrite 192
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 36
125% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 166
132% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 84
SusWrite 91.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
487GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.4% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 28.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0C2D S22E310
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback