MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 05:56
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Memory 17.4
1-Core 12.4
2-Core 20
11% 16.6 Pts
4-Core 45.9
8-Core 82.1
8% 64 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 87.9
24% 53.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 82.5
69% 84.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 345 322 233 295 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 641
Write 309
Mixed 436
SusWrite 293
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5.2
24% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 410%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
154GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 105 94 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 122
Write 125
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 103
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
15GB free
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 3.7 3.4 34 14 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 262
Write 108
Mixed 114
SusWrite 15.8
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.5
710% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 160%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 31 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 34.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 33
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 21.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 332
12% 332 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 31 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $679
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback