Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 days ago, 10 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 05:55
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$280
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 210
2-Core 418
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,511
140% 1,166 Pts
64-Core 2,915
180% 2,915 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3825 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 135
Parallax 139
118% 140 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 116
Splatting 90.3
94% 119 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 461 466 452 469 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 463
Mixed 446
SusWrite 464
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 51.8
175% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 340
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 118%
Great: 137%
Samsung 990 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2953 920 922 912 926 904 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,345
Write 3,338
Mixed 2,335
SusWrite 1,256
523% 2,319 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 93.3
286% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1631
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 1,332
1,016% 1,384 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 323%
Great: 424%
PNY SSD2SC120G3LC709B121-490P 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.9 2.2 6.9 3.1 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 560
Write 35.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
56% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
118GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22,871
Mixed 57.7
8,192% 11,464 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
440GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 83.1
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
156% Outstanding
MC Read 64.1
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 57.3
173% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 28.3
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 156%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 10 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B4 SAMSUNG
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback