Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 287%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics281% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 05:43
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 317
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,050
103% 843 Pts
64-Core 1484
92% 1484 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
Asus(1043 8978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
281% Outstanding
Lighting 413
Reflection 444
Parallax 530
336% 462 fps
MRender 524
Gravity 393
Splatting 260
306% 392 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 281%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 1TB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2148 2147 2196 1660 1595 1677 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WDS100T2B0B 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: 4110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 429 430 417 430 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 443
Mixed 320
SusWrite 425
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 26.1
107% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 252
215% 317 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
806GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 8.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17,599
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 1.7
3,144% 4,401 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
708GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 60 83 80 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 108
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 70.5
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.3
178% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 67%
WD WD101EFBX-68B0AN0 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 85.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 133 180 173 178 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 192
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 154
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
312% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
136GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.8 21 4.1 3.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 61
Write 54.5
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 6.9
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 28.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 28.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback