MSI PRO B660M-A DDR4 (MS-7D43)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D43
MotherboardMSI PRO B660M-A DDR4 (MS-7D43)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 05:41
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 91.5
20% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 39.4
8-Core 36.9
5% 38.2 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
Poor: 92% Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 49.1
Parallax 72.2
31% 53.1 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 55.5
48% 58.5 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 347
Write 282
Mixed 311
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 19.5
51% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 90.2
83% 128 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 29.1
Mixed 13.7
43% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.3
147% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 456
9% 456 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 62% 13 108 7 60 23.8" 1920 1080 HKC2496 24E4
Typical PRO B660M-A DDR4 (MS-7D43) Builds (Compare 2,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO B660M-A DDR4 (MS-7D43)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback