Asrock X299 Taichi CLX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Taichi CLX  (all builds)
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 05:36
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 1,044
93% 784 Pts
64-Core 2140
132% 2140 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.4% Good
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 83.9
Parallax 80.4
68% 82.7 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 68.9
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1290 1000 884 910 905 865 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,990
Write 2,028
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 976
379% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 72.3
266% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 956
713% 956 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 263%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FJ CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 31.8
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 19 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical X299 Taichi CLX Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi CLX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback