Asrock B650M Pro RS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M Pro RS  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M Pro RS
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 04:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 208
2-Core 384
117% 223 Pts
4-Core 730
8-Core 1,226
119% 978 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700-XT
ASRock(1849 5323) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 255
Parallax 411
174% 293 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 251
Splatting 272
212% 258 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 170%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,065
Write 3,438
Mixed 3,163
722% 3,222 MB/s
4K Read 79
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 116
389% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,658
DQ Write 1,386
DQ Mixed 1,519
1,139% 1,521 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
392GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50% Average
Read 67.2
Write 64.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 107
48% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
149% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 52.8
MC Mixed 52.3
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 50.8
SC Write 55.1
SC Mixed 50.9
149% 52.3 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 149%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 27" 1280 720 BNQ78EC BenQ GL2780
Typical B650M Pro RS Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M Pro RS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $910
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback