Asus PRIME A620M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A620M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 20:46
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 365
110% 210 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 1,001
103% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,335
83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 111
Parallax 149
132% 141 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
110% 140 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MLD M500 NVMe SSD 500GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,577
Write 3,687
Mixed 2,240
567% 2,501 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 96
358% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1,512
1,122% 1,491 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 28
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS242B ASUS VG247Q1A
Typical PRIME A620M-K Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A620M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback