Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 16:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 839
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.23
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 14.3
13% 13.1 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 15.3
11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 26 75 76 2.4 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 456
Write 134
Mixed 101
SusWrite 55.4
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 21.3
108% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 0.2
54% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 78%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 314 317 319 319 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 487
Mixed 409
SusWrite 332
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
WDC WDS200T2G0A-00JH30 2TB
550GB free
Firmware: UP450400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 51 38 145 132 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 451
Write 399
Mixed 316
SusWrite 135
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 15.8
76% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 32.4
46% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
559GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 92
Write 77.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 80.1
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 20.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 60 31.5" 1280 720 HPN351A HP 32 Display
Typical TUF GAMING H470-PRO Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback