Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 213
2-Core 420
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1441
136% 1,131 Pts
64-Core 2,823
175% 2,823 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 107
Parallax 159
83% 123 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 119
Splatting 74.7
76% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3794 1055 954 851 832 823 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 3,897
Write 4,021
Mixed 2,883
SusWrite 1,385
682% 3,047 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 80
278% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,158
DQ Write 1,753
DQ Mixed 1,911
1,443% 1,940 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 413%
Great: 494%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 942 361 364 368 1100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,884
Write 2,188
Mixed 1,954
SusWrite 894
390% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 73.3
250% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1907
DQ Write 1,524
DQ Mixed 1,727
1,289% 1,719 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 284%
Great: 394%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
428GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 420 419 421 399 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 453
Mixed 412
SusWrite 412
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 47.9
173% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 260
221% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
900GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 114
Mixed 113
SusWrite 126
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 134 132 137 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 151
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 135
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
351GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 56.1
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 68
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 62.3
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 55.6
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 51.1
SC Write 60.6
SC Mixed 53.1
157% 54.9 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 159%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 15 213 58 60 34" 3440 1377 IVM7628 PL3466WQ
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback