Koloe H610M4-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemKoloe H610M4-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardKOLOE H610M4-PLUS
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230317
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 11:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 62.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 342
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 963
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e1000 512G 512GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN2789
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 358 310 324 342 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,490
Write 1719
Mixed 525
SusWrite 494
236% 1057 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 52.3
175% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 659
573% 855 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 186%
Great: 259%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 174 171 178 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 69
SusWrite 171
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 0" 1280 720
Typical H610M4-PLUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Koloe H610M4-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback