Asrock Z690 Extreme WiFi 6E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Extreme WiFi 6E  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 10:56
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 200
2-Core 426
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 853
8-Core 1,507
142% 1,180 Pts
64-Core 2,554
158% 2,554 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Asus(1043 05D7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 136
Parallax 288
112% 187 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 148
Splatting 204
161% 197 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2026 1940 1940 1942 1956 1943 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1,822
Write 2,244
Mixed 1,271
SusWrite 1,958
412% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 55.6
235% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,575
DQ Write 1,350
DQ Mixed 1,479
1,104% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 328%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
931GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2029 1921 1922 1915 1915 1911 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1898
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,754
SusWrite 1,936
418% 1,854 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 69.6
214% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,696
DQ Write 1,407
DQ Mixed 1,555
1,163% 1,552 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 330%
Great: 410%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$193
2TB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2762 2762 2779 2744 2858 2893 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 3072
Write 2,697
Mixed 2,048
SusWrite 2,800
597% 2,654 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 61.2
193% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 1,402
DQ Mixed 1,554
1,161% 1,547 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 422%
Great: 564%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
795GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 116 115 119 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 83.3
Write 104
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 116
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 145 143 147 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 72.4
Write 122
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 141
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 90%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
461GB free
Firmware: VE0R840E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 411 411 412 407 409 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 43
130% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 47.8
SC Mixed 31.5
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 27" 2048 1081 MSI3CA8 MSI MAG274QRF
Typical Z690 Extreme WiFi 6E Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Extreme WiFi 6E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback