Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 10:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 778
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 1,388
86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2786 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 199
Parallax 194
160% 196 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 195
Splatting 131
125% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2135 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 327
Write 260
Mixed 261
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 25.2
90% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 140
127% 195 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 82%
Asmt ASM236X NVME 1TB
278GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 734
Write 175
Mixed 274
85% 394 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 12.6
58% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 23.9
44% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 150%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
53GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 43.2
Mixed 60.1
87% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
182% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 33.8
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 4 60 54.6" 1536 864 SAM0E33 SAMSUNG
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback