Asus ASUS AIO M3700WUA_M3700WUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS AIO M3700WUA_M3700WUA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3700WUA
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 05:38
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 277
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 760
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 18BC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 24.4
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 18.7
13% 14.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 1344 200 29 143 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,546
Mixed 1,272
SusWrite 550
301% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 67.9
224% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 409
360% 527 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 211%
Great: 290%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 138 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 119
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 138
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 26 60 27" 1280 720 AUO0500 M3700WUA
Typical ASUS AIO M3700WUA_M3700WUA Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS AIO M3700WUA_M3700WUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback