Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV_GA402XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV_GA402XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GA402XV
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 03:04
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,126
105% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,479
92% 1,479 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 180D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.84.03
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 83.7
52% 53.5 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 95.2
55% 62.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 180D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 158
Parallax 144
136% 157 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 122
Splatting 98.1
115% 148 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,295
Write 2,080
Mixed 1,915
467% 2,097 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 41.5
137% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 865
589% 740 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 24
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 165 24.9" 1280 720 HWP3322 HP 25es
Typical ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV_GA402XV Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XV_GA402XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback