Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 03:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$234
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 218
2-Core 431
125% 244 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1,474
139% 1,154 Pts
64-Core 1,927
119% 1,927 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 259
Parallax 524
196% 341 fps
MRender 396
Gravity 210
Splatting 331
256% 312 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 193%
Great: 214%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
757GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 745 144 362 145 141 1119 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 2,813
Mixed 1,968
SusWrite 443
431% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 101
369% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 1,433
DQ Mixed 872
740% 1058 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 291%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 52
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 50.1
153% 53.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 150%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0F14 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback