Asus ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive509% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240407
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 23:50
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 193
2-Core 371
117% 220 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1,292
119% 996 Pts
64-Core 1,835
114% 1,835 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
AMD(1002 1002) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 301
Reflection 422
Parallax 604
246% 442 fps
Gravity 241
Splatting 432
312% 336 fps
Poor: 158% Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP700 2TB
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQFM22.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5328 2974 1416 1472 714 1036 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
509% Outstanding
Read 6,027
Write 4,949
Mixed 3,340
SusWrite 2,157
918% 4,118 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 81.1
262% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,514
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,358
978% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 459%
This bench: 509%
Great: 843%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
929GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 101 93 100 74 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 74.3
MC Write 60.9
MC Mixed 68.5
194% 67.9 GB/s
SC Read 60.6
SC Write 60.3
SC Mixed 57.6
170% 59.5 GB/s
Latency 41
98% 41 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 189%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 48 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7750 LG HDR 4K
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback