HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 18 '24 at 23:22
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 48.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 177 62% 114 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 624 68% 539 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.5% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 85.5 Parallax 74.6 70% 81.8 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 65 Splatting 60.4 52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 207 150 145 138 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 532 Write 746 Mixed 414 SusWrite 166 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 43.6 121% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 780 DQ Write 443 DQ Mixed 675 485% 633 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 694GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 174 181 181 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 128 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 176 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.9 28% 10 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	55	144	27"	1920 1009	GSM5B71 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,409x
Core i7-9700Intel $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,038x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	721x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,343x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	839x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	721x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,414x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,239x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	302x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,917x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	784x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	457x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $329

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16