Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221227
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 23:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 313
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 975
98% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
MSI(1462 8D9D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 93.3
84% 94.6 fps
MRender 86
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 67
61% 76.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,499
Write 2,621
Mixed 1,919
455% 2,013 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 95
334% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,225
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 1,059
782% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical A520M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback