Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231009
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 22:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 196
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 352
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPART512GBC2DVT 512GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW000003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,140
Write 1,127
Mixed 890
235% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 63
210% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 746
575% 791 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 260%
Buffalo SSD-PGU3 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 0000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 323
Write 257
Mixed 263
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 22.4
92% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 21.2
47% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 14.2" 1280 720 MPI7002 MPI7002
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback