Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 22:35
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$281
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,088
101% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,586
98% 1,586 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
PowerColor(148C 2407) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 163
Parallax 352
140% 229 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 128
Splatting 197
168% 209 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 140%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR313
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,927
Write 2,487
Mixed 2,075
486% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 80.3
260% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 859
662% 903 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
450GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2409 1432 578 740 368 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 2,372
Mixed 2,015
SusWrite 978
411% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 83.4
277% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 857
667% 917 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 265%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 30.4
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 32.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 5R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 64% 14 193 15 144 27" 1280 720 GBT271B G27F 2
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,051
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback