Lenovo 82XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82XT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 22:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 71.2
1-Core 188
2-Core 374
109% 211 Pts
4-Core 752
8-Core 1,421
130% 1,087 Pts
64-Core 1,743
108% 1,743 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3C93) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.43
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 97.4
51% 61.1 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 98.1
60% 68.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1502 768 70 79 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,390
SusWrite 665
295% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 34.3
168% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 875
641% 842 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 193%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 43.2
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 39.6
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 43.2
126% 44 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 126%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOE3A1
Typical 82XT Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 82XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback