Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 21:26
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 237
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 462
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (40 fps cap detected)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 40
34% 40.2 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 26.5
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 312 317 318 318 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 1,420
Mixed 724
SusWrite 344
243% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 34.6
165% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1028
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 662
537% 771 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 183%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
150GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 405 409 433 429 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 427
Mixed 393
SusWrite 390
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 41
126% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 306
243% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 125%
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB
219GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 193 195 201 204 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 335
Write 228
Mixed 226
SusWrite 206
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 35.4
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 209
182% 267 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 103%
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 117 110 118 114 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 451
Mixed 378
SusWrite 146
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 40.3
138% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 166
150% 229 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 89%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
455GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 452 446 438 448 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 443
Mixed 323
SusWrite 445
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 33.2
121% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 67.3
127% 251 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 108%
Kingston SNA-DC/U3 512GB
402GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 286 290 181 190 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 336
Write 311
Mixed 314
SusWrite 226
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 26.2
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 131
97% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 28.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 2R 8G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 12% 111 211 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA098 DELL P2214H
Typical GA-Z270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback