Asus PRIME A520M-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A II  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 21:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$123
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 922
97% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,375
Write 2,206
Mixed 1,533
453% 2,038 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 75.4
249% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 264
321% 579 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 148 158 145 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 150
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 154
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 Kingston 9905702-082.B00G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.3% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A520M-A II Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback