MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 222%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A DDR4  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 20:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
126% 243 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,285
133% 1,069 Pts
64-Core 1,542
96% 1,542 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3285 MHz, MLim: 6032 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 469
Parallax 494
141% 379 fps
MRender 551
Gravity 392
Splatting 279
319% 407 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 181%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
444GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3130 2314 1747 1804 1781 1791 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
421% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2,732
Mixed 2,646
SusWrite 2,094
559% 2,475 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 116
372% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 2,013
DQ Write 1,575
DQ Mixed 1,781
1,336% 1,790 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 421%
Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 465 451 450 430 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 452
Mixed 382
SusWrite 434
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 53.6
198% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
709GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 474 476 474 468 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 460
Mixed 389
SusWrite 466
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 54.9
202% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
572GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 474 476 474 468 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 445
Mixed 403
SusWrite 466
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 54.2
200% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
730GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 52.9
Write 34.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 36.1
49% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2C3000C16 CMK16GX4M2C3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 33.1
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 32.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 44 175 34.8" 1280 720 DELA1E4 Dell AW3423DW
Typical PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 19,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 - $209

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback