MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 20:20
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,128
100% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,314
143% 2,314 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 232C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 251
Parallax 491
194% 327 fps
MRender 401
Gravity 207
Splatting 323
254% 310 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 192%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,160
Write 2,397
Mixed 1,940
484% 2,166 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 78.7
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,259
936% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 374%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
16GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 16.9
Mixed 25
55% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.4
241% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 40.4
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 27" 1920 1009 DELA147 AW2720HFA
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback