O.e.m Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardO.e.m Intel H81  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 20:00
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 173
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 261
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 42
30% 39.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVM25/128GB 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 401 404 226 84 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 505
Write 412
Mixed 417
SusWrite 266
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 29.3
125% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 50.5
92% 176 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01L3LF8GB52852816 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 4R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 61% 18 211 56 75 18.9" 1440 900 GSM4B70 W1942
Typical Intel H81 Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: O.e.m Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback