ABS Gaming PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemABS Gaming PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO B660M-A CEC WIFI DDR4 V2 (MS-7D37)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 180
2-Core 344
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,150
109% 905 Pts
64-Core 1,629
101% 1,629 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3210 MHz, MLim: 4288 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 115
Parallax 158
137% 147 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 133
Splatting 103
117% 149 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
637GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02106
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,956
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,495
399% 1,789 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 39.4
192% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 607
498% 710 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 36
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 27.9
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 SAM7181 Odyssey G50A
Typical Gaming PC Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

System: ABS Gaming PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback