Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 271
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 968
91% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 173
Parallax 178
145% 176 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
126% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 514 517 518 501 501 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,449
Write 1,495
Mixed 136
SusWrite 523
252% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 84.9
282% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 579
531% 828 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 260%
Great: 311%
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 1TB
183GB free
Firmware: EIFM31.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,482
Write 4,025
Mixed 2,895
706% 3,134 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 103
332% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 984
750% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 243% Great: 504%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 177 178 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 150
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 175
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 38.8
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 38.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27.9" 1280 720 ACR0907 XV282K KV
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback