Asrock H470M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H470M-HDV/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210727
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '24 at 19:37
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 130 64% 101 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 262 33% 251 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.3% Very good	Lighting 95.2 Reflection 97.9 Parallax 87.8 78% 93.6 fps	MRender 98.3 Gravity 88.1 Splatting 77.3 71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253E2512G 512GB 801 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08435 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 336 347 356 348 338 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 308 Write 410 Mixed 273 SusWrite 352 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 24.5 101% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 188 154% 217 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 598GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 152 149 151 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 157 Write 133 Mixed 104 SusWrite 151 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GB 3,623 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	57	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H470M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H470M-HDV/M.2

CPU
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	279x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	204x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	94x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	301x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	50x

SSD
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	238x
HX512GSSDM2PCIE 512GBBench 197%, 40 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x

RAM
GR2666D464L19S/8G 1x8GBGoodramBench 45%, 793 samples	239x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	23x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-XNC 2x16GBHynixBench 92%, 70 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16