Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 258%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:19
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 209
2-Core 417
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 803
8-Core 1,609
142% 1,206 Pts
64-Core 2,936
182% 2,936 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 252
Parallax 276
219% 266 fps
MRender 337
Gravity 233
Splatting 177
196% 249 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 189%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2519 1994 1848 1958 2031 2002 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 1,835
Write 4,226
Mixed 3,404
SusWrite 2,059
657% 2,881 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 117
400% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,990
DQ Write 1,583
DQ Mixed 1,765
1,327% 1,779 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 402%
Great: 521%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
929GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3024 3492 3494 2429 1719 1761 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 2,872
Write 3,468
Mixed 3,131
SusWrite 2,653
685% 3,031 MB/s
4K Read 88.3
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 132
434% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,036
DQ Write 1,636
DQ Mixed 1,829
1,371% 1834 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 494%
Great: 488%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 71.4
Mixed 7.7
70% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
159% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 58.6
177% 61.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 29.9
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 159%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 31.5" 2560 1387 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $952
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback