Lenovo 83EX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83EX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240227
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:16
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 243
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 834
76% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,336
83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24.19
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 66.2
30% 46.4 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 25.1
21% 25 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,940
Write 1,333
Mixed 1,342
341% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 31.4
111% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 508
338% 418 MB/s
Poor: 293% Great: 557%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 558
Mixed 479
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 27.1
83% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 276
199% 256 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC56BD1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 643 374 165 16" 1707 996 BOE0B38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback