Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive534% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 207
2-Core 413
120% 232 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1,498
136% 1,145 Pts
64-Core 2,670
165% 2,670 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 113%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 11.9
4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3997 3996 3961 3943 3846 3408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
534% Outstanding
Read 3702
Write 4135
Mixed 2,764
SusWrite 3,859
816% 3,615 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 96
328% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1,094
820% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 534%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 47.2
141% 49.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 10 165 16" 1707 996 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback