Dell Inspiron 24 5420 All-in-One

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Inspiron 24 5420 All-in-One  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D27CW
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 261
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 497
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0BF2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 18.2
11% 17.3 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 15.9
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme BC901 SK hynix 512GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51006151 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,608
Write 1,886
Mixed 1,554
377% 1,682 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 40.7
205% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 372
273% 363 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J641GU49J2320NE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23" 1280 720 DEL9409 DELL AIO
Typical Inspiron 24 5420 All-in-One Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Dell Inspiron 24 5420 All-in-One

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback