Asus PRIME A620M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 219%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A620M-A  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 18:17
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 187
2-Core 373
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,069
111% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 467
Parallax 331
240% 364 fps
MRender 461
Gravity 266
Splatting 213
244% 313 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 214%
Great: 235%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 796 802 813 813 810 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 2,041
Write 2,042
Mixed 1,112
SusWrite 802
335% 1,499 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 23.2
105% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 46.5
76% 158 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 171%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 28
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 23.8" 1920 1009 AUS242F VG249QM1A
Typical PRIME A620M-A Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A620M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback