Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 17:08
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,171
106% 891 Pts
64-Core 2188
135% 2188 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Gigabyte(1458 2327) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 176
Parallax 367
142% 239 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 134
Splatting 207
175% 217 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3194 964 640 228 561 762 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,274
Write 3,679
Mixed 2,345
SusWrite 1058
528% 2,339 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 86.1
306% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 1,160
867% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 301%
Great: 472%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$296
3.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 435 437 437 435 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 422
Mixed 375
SusWrite 436
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 51.8
169% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 139
124% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%
Team T2534TB 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: N4PA30A8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 441 443 441 441 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 401
Write 439
Mixed 395
SusWrite 441
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 15.6
131% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 20.3
63% 137 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 121%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 440 443 442 441 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 432
Mixed 400
SusWrite 442
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 50.7
168% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 195
151% 206 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 39.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 144 34" 2752 1089 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback