ABS Gaming PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics376% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemABS Gaming PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG Z790 EDGE WIFI (MS-7D91)
Memory119.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 246
2-Core 478
135% 267 Pts
4-Core 955
8-Core 1889
168% 1422 Pts
64-Core 4,551
282% 4,551 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
376% Outstanding
Lighting 606
Reflection 545
Parallax 721
494% 624 fps
MRender 503
Gravity 541
Splatting 291
349% 445 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 376%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,699
Write 2,674
Mixed 1,804
464% 2059 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 89.7
334% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,701
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 1,285
940% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 212% Great: 358%
MSI M450 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EJFM80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1100
Write 2,619
Mixed 1,300
379% 1,673 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 69.8
258% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,845
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,365
1,031% 1,406 MB/s
Poor: 212% Great: 358%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 49.5
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 25.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 131%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 144 31.5" 2560 1369 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
Typical Gaming PC Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

System: ABS Gaming PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback