MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 16:39
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 334
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,023
106% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 154
Parallax 152
122% 152 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 128
Splatting 118
115% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,850
Write 3295
Mixed 3,026
686% 3,057 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 106
362% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,196
891% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
626GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 302
Mixed 400
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 50
179% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
94GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 430
Mixed 350
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 45.7
165% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 176
177% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
832GB free
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,148
Write 1860
Mixed 1,396
331% 1468 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 79.6
285% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,202
867% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
833GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 137
Mixed 67.8
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
8GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 18.1
Mixed 40
64% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.6
134% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2705 VG27AQL1A
Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback