Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory118.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 16:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 294
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 928
90% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 129
Parallax 120
94% 121 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 104
Splatting 114
103% 128 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1117 1064 1013 970 949 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,662
Write 2,480
Mixed 1869
SusWrite 1,064
452% 2,019 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 92.7
311% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,337
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,122
850% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 320%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 36.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 35.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 24.1" 1920 1129 HWP309E HP Z24i
Typical PRIME B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback