Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:56
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 67.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 279
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 811
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 13.8
14% 16.2 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 9.2
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,575
Write 3,062
Mixed 1,690
476% 2,109 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 79.7
302% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 841
638% 862 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BGXS 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 16.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 193 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback