To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 690
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 143
Parallax 134
105% 135 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2200S NVMe 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22001070 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 485 303 229 215 212 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,153
Write 967
Mixed 854
SusWrite 331
184% 826 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 42.1
138% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 521
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 365
284% 395 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 127%
Great: 194%
SKHynix_HFS001TD9TNI-L2B0B 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 11710C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1767 1868 1861 1367 1331 1327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1516
Write 1,838
Mixed 1,462
SusWrite 1,587
362% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 52.5
177% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 395
301% 414 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 231%
Great: 297%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB
184GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 55 57 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 158
Write 13.9
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 55.7
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 37.1
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2498 VS248
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback