Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
30 days ago, 30 days ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 786
74% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
86% 106 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 97.7
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 381 376 400 379 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 442
Write 346
Mixed 404
SusWrite 376
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 36.2
120% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 209
167% 241 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 133%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
884GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 457 490 518 506 507 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,876
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 632
322% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 36.7
138% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 213
212% 359 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 175%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.7
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 280 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback