MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 889
89% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Gigabyte(1458 240B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 182
Parallax 298
126% 212 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 170
Splatting 218
170% 207 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 133%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 296
Mixed 223
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 0.2
52% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
483GB free
Firmware: 2BA30002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 20.2
Mixed 64.1
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DDR4 8GB 2666MHz 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 31.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 22.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 0R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 19% 52 157 3 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback