PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | INTEL Intel H110 Series |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190419 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 18 '24 at 08:55 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 97% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 112 41 70 87 71 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
684GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 139 135 139 139 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36% | 36% | 44 | 198 | 57 | 75 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | AOC2402 24V2W1G5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,027x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 963x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 911x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 494x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 483x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 462x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |