Biostar H61MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV3  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 308
45% 327 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 175
Parallax 109
88% 131 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 106
Splatting 104
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 91 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 232
Write 207
Mixed 209
SusWrite 88.2
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 13.1
68% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 17.1
20% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
162GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 191 162 61 58 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Above average
Read 222
Write 198
Mixed 181
SusWrite 112
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 29.2
104% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 38
31% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
282GB free
Firmware: 2AR20003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 42 37 39 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 102
Write 71.8
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 42.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
TESLA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 3R 3G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 15% 106 215 59 75 21.5" 1920 1017 XMIA011 Redmi 215 NF
Typical H61MHV3 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback