Hasee N8xEJEK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemHasee N8xEJEK  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N8xEJEK
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 06:56
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 72.8
38% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 222
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 36
24% 35 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 0.2
16% 22.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 74 108 19 28 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 316
Write 119
Mixed 258
SusWrite 63.5
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 14.9
58% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 21.2
52% 115 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
521GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 108 107 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 119
Write 97.7
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 107
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06CB
Typical N8xEJEK Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Hasee N8xEJEK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback