Asus PRIME Z790-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 286%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 days ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z790-P  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 06:55
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 223
2-Core 444
132% 254 Pts
4-Core 890
8-Core 1601
150% 1,246 Pts
64-Core 2,697
167% 2,697 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 131%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 286
Parallax 310
238% 296 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 253
Splatting 190
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMB0.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 1829 1458 1428 183 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 1,885
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 896
365% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 87.3
4K Write 408
4K Mixed 120
502% 205 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 1,762
DQ Mixed 1,058
884% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 342%
Great: 230%
AMD R5MP960G8 960GB
318GB free
Firmware: V0714C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1482 1475 1555 1556 1553 1537 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,609
Write 1,456
Mixed 1,070
SusWrite 1,526
318% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 29.3
247% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 533
513% 802 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 269%
Great: 259%
AMD R5SL960G 960GB
93GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 440 431 452 444 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 457
Mixed 408
SusWrite 351
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 26.2
173% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 32.8
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 177 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 457
Mixed 412
SusWrite 162
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 64.5
220% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 244
200% 284 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 113%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
345GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 137 137 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 180
Write 101
Mixed 103
SusWrite 131
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF572C38-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
242% Outstanding
MC Read 97.4
MC Write 98.8
MC Mixed 91.5
274% 95.9 GB/s
SC Read 33.5
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 45.2
127% 44.5 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 242%
Great: 252%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 1R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 218 59 144 27" 2560 1377 IVM663D PL2760Q
Typical PRIME Z790-P Builds (Compare 2,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z790-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback