Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 days ago, 14 days ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z790 Steel Legend WiFi
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 06:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$375
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 231
2-Core 464
135% 262 Pts
4-Core 923
8-Core 1,753
159% 1,338 Pts
64-Core 3,882
240% 3,882 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
Asus(1043 8974) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
225% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 317
Parallax 337
262% 325 fps
MRender 458
Gravity 266
Splatting 214
244% 313 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 225%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
586GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,424
Write 4,557
Mixed 3,186
904% 4,056 MB/s
4K Read 83.5
4K Write 282
4K Mixed 109
416% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,117
DQ Write 1,611
DQ Mixed 1,831
1,378% 1,853 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
787GB free
Firmware: CC46
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 187
Mixed 84.5
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
196% Outstanding
MC Read 83.7
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 73.9
222% 77.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 29.5
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 196%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 9G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 59% 37 534 451 144 27" 2048 1152 AOC2710 AG271QG4
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback