MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 321%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 326%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics302% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D67
MotherboardMSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)  (all builds)
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 04:31
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 359
115% 214 Pts
4-Core 706
8-Core 1242
118% 974 Pts
64-Core 1,708
106% 1,708 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
302% Outstanding
Lighting 460
Reflection 448
Parallax 481
375% 463 fps
MRender 527
Gravity 393
Splatting 260
307% 393 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 302%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 353 160 188 145 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,537
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,699
SusWrite 466
317% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 81.3
282% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,487
DQ Write 1,153
DQ Mixed 1,236
948% 1,292 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 236%
Great: 295%
T-force 1TB 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 415 423 429 417 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 404
Mixed 414
SusWrite 424
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 27.9
147% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 47
95% 187 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 340 341 349 346 346 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 337
Write 366
Mixed 255
SusWrite 345
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 38
141% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 230
172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 105%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3820 3817 3863 3782 3732 3680 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
540% Outstanding
Read 3,476
Write 4,020
Mixed 2,593
SusWrite 3,782
783% 3,468 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 75.7
284% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 2,078
DQ Write 1,702
DQ Mixed 1,822
1,383% 1,868 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 540%
Great: 633%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 159 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 144
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 158
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 66.1
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 63.2
176% 61.7 GB/s
SC Read 53.7
SC Write 59.2
SC Mixed 51.8
157% 54.9 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 171%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 120 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7232 Odyssey G70B
Typical PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67) Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback