Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NT
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 23:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 172
2-Core 330
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1252
113% 950 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700S
Asus(1043 1513) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.40.84.06
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 158
Parallax 228
107% 172 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 165
Splatting 195
147% 177 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1983 1911 2245 2323 1987 1939 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,962
Write 2,457
Mixed 2,090
SusWrite 2,065
537% 2,393 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61.6
217% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 903
626% 802 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 345%
Great: 465%
SHGP31-2000GM 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 31060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1744 1873 1843 1855 1783 1809 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,235
Write 1,589
Mixed 1412
SusWrite 1,818
395% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64.8
217% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 798
557% 716 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 298%
Great: 446%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX32GX5M1A4800C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 45.3
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 52.8
SC Mixed 33.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 128%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 14 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback